Did the Seventh Circuit err in upholding two orders issued by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois barring the petitioner from filing any document, regardless of merit, in the Southern District of Illinois for two years and sanctioning the petitioner $1,000 fine?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . Did Pre Seventy Ciecuth ene in uprrel ding two orders issued ‘by United Skockes Disteick Suadge T. PHN Gobet of The Unvred Steves Werice Couct for Tre, Soutnenn Datvice o& TWinais Barring ne Tom Xeling, any douMenr, Feaord\ess ot merit, in Whe Sout trem Detrick ot Lncic For Aes Yyeors ook Sanckiowing me site $1000 fine. ualrere,: ay the order Barring. me. Stan Win mesivoriqus Aocurmenss inthe District Coa’ 15 Cecognrzed by every other Ciccary Ao condtitute an Ga~ Cen: arVrictional dental of Tre rion of actess rr Here coucts) b) thea Seveth Cireat® calied an False enicstatements of Mhe cecerdta yey uphadaing the order entered in Lube y, Collis SOTM Case e 2O0-cvOWT, a 6) tere. GGS na proper Caco basis for Pre S1200 fines, SY Phe Sewently Ciccusts Kindicg Phat, wlren T trendered a cemnissary tcusk actount stokennent ust te my ins forrma Qauperis application on lshitew, United States SPIN Case Noi View 663 Sout, AA ak copy . the Lomenissary Aeust informatian one The, ctonngany'ng affidavit, L fied on “untrue: claimmak poverty, 16 contrary te (Hs oun andather ; Cicusts cose las andis atnenwlse a Caise. misstatement af the cecord ,