No. 22-5962
Marquis Donte Brown v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing due-process judicial-review post-booker-hearing safety-valve sentencing-discretion sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-12-02
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court erred by imposing an unlawful sentence contrary to the mandates of § 3553(a) and §3553(f)(5) which preclude use of information disclosed through the safety valve procedure to enhance the sentence
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT ERRED BY IMPOSING AN UNLAWFUL SENTENCE CONTRARY TO THE MANDATES OF § 3553(a) AND §3553(f)(5) WHICH PRECLUDE USE OF INFORMATION DISCLOSED THROUGH THE SAFETY VALVE PROCEDURE TO ENHANCE THE SENTENCE. Prefix.
Docket Entries
2022-12-05
Petition DENIED.
2022-11-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/2/2022.
2022-11-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-10-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 1, 2022)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent