whether-interstate-agreement-on-detainers-act-was-violated

QUESTIONS PRESENTED SUMMATION OF THE ISSUESIWhether Hunter Brown's Covington, County, Al. Charges in CASE NO. :CC-20-303, should've been dismissed pursuant to the Interstate Agreement on Detainer's Act since he was not brought to trial on those charges within 180 days of serving the prosecuting officer and the Court with his request for final disposition and written notice of the place of his imprisonment. IlWhether the circuit court erred in awarding restitution to Progressive Insurance when no admissible evidence was offered to show how the value of the restitution amount was determined. QUESTIONS PRESENTEDIWould the United States Supreme Court support the errors of the State of Alabama in accepting Mr. Brown to go to trial within 180 days pursuant to the Interstate Agreement on Detainer's Act. . . knowing that COVID restrictions went into effect a month before receiving Mr. Brown's request preventing ALL Trial in the State of Alabama? IISome party State's have enacted time lines to cases involving speedy trial claims. Page four of the Appellee's brief in