No. 22-5968

Grant Manaku v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-11-01
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process fourth-amendment law-enforcement rule-41 search-warrant warrant-service
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference: 2022-12-02
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the agents deliberately violate the federal rule of criminal procedure—Rule 41(f)(1)(C)—that requires agents to serve a warrant when that warrant is executed?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Question Presented When executing a search warrant, agents disassembled their five-page warrant, disregarded homeowners’ repeated requests for a copy of the warrant, and served (when the search was done) only the warrant’s facesheet. Did the agents deliberately violate the federal rule of criminal procedure—Rule 41(f)(1)(C)—that requires agents to serve a warrant when that warrant is executed? 2 Parties and Proceedings The caption lists all

Docket Entries

2022-12-05
Petition DENIED.
2022-11-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/2/2022.
2022-11-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2022-10-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 1, 2022)

Attorneys

Grant Manaku
Craig William JeromeOffice of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Craig William JeromeOffice of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent