Herbert W. G. Clanton v. Sam's Club, et al.
ERISA DueProcess EmploymentDiscrimina JusticiabilityDoctri
Whether the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure required compliance with the minimum benefits, privileges, immunities, and degrees of protection guaranteed to Herbert W.G. Clanton under the First, Fifth, Thirteenth, and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution, the Equal Protection Clause, and the Due Process Clause
No question identified. : . : a ; . . ISSUES FOR CONSIDERAT LON ARE, the Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure required to comply with a minimum of the benefits, privileges, immunities, degrees of protection guaranteed the person of Herbert W.G. Clanton, and this Petitioner by a minimum of Amendment I; § V; § XIII; § XIV of the United States Constitution, the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution, and the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution? : ; . HAVE, the Respondents demonstrated actions devoid of substance and practices of , Discrimination In Employment, in violations of a minimum of Federal Title VI; § VII; § ADEA et seq/al, and violations of the Federal Civil Rights Act of-1964(FCRA; § FCRA1964)? , HAVE, the Respondents established a continuous and ongoing pattern of conducts’ ; whereby it is shown that the person of Herbert W.G. Clanton, are deprived of a minimum of the benefits, privileges, immunities, degrees of protections, and State and Federal, Civil and Constitutional Rights as guaranteed by a minimum of the Equal Protection Clause of the ; United States Constitution et seq/al? HAS, it been proven the need to remand pursuant to enforcement of a minimum of the . benefits, privileges, immunities, degrees of protections, and State and Federal, Civil and Constitutional Rights as guaranteed by a minimum of the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution et seq/al? : , ~ .