Whether a prosecutor who misrepresents witness testimony, asks false leading questions, and solicits false testimony has committed a fundamental error, in violation of a defendant's constitutional right to a fair and impartial trial, and to due process

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1) WHETHER A PADSECUTCA WHO fMSREPRESENTS WHTNESS TESTIMONY , ASKS FALSE LEADING: QUESTIONS, AMO SoLicirs FABSE 7ESTIMENY HAS Commr7TED FUNDAMENTAL Edhoie, IS VIOLATION OF A pErENbANTS : CONSTITUTIVNAL Ribit TO A FAIR AND WIPHATIAL TRIAL, WO TO NUE PHOCESS, 2) LSHETER BEL Tord En Plosne AS A MEMBER OF THE Audience AT A CONFERENCE ess . ju . You are the experts!” ys surcicent TO QUAUFY A WiTWlSS AS AN EXPERT AND WHETHER, THER SUBSEQUENT 7EStimovy RwS AFeuL OF RULE 702/704 “Aap lon VioLnteS A O€FEnopn7's Rigu7 TO A FAIR WW IMPARTIAL TRIAL , AND TO Dut PaecESS. 3) WHETHER THE CoLeATERAL ATIALL PROCESS SHovLO ALLOW A SHoWwINt OF ProSs€cuTedsae MS coJouit WHEN Doin So Woutd ReQuing EWOCNLE NoT EVTERED AT TLAL but ANALABLE To THE PROSE CuTon, PRE-ThAL. 4) WHETHER A peo-SE LUTIGANT ASKING FOR WLLUSION OF RELIEF THE StTATE ARGLED AGAwsT BCFonE THE Coutts map€ Any QvuuinG WAS FAIRLY WiLUDED AWD SNoued BE Con$io€2ko5S) Wane HER THE baduvau€ WTI THE Portillo ISTRLETION IMPEAMISSABLY LovsERS THE STINONLD of Gut BY APPEALING To OXES FECLINGS RATHER TUAW LEASON. Co) WHETHER ANY OF THE ISSVES HERE GWE THIS CouRT CAUSE TO REVERSE AnD lok REmand PeTrT1s62S Conviction’ CASE, : 2