No. 22-5978
Richard R. Crawford v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: arbitrary-and-capricious arbitrary-capricious certificate-of-appealability constitutional-rights criminal-procedure detention-versus-arrest due-process evidentiary-hearing sworn-testimony
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure HabeasCorpus
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2022-12-02
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a determination by the lower courts that the officers only detained the petitioner, and not arrested him, which finding was in direct conflict with the sworn testimony of arresting officers, produced an arbitrary and capricious decision?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : :
Docket Entries
2022-12-05
Petition DENIED.
2022-11-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/2/2022.
2022-11-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-10-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 2, 2022)
Attorneys
Richard R. Crawford
Richard R. Crawford — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent