No. 22-5983
Cordavia Daniels v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-3553(a) age-consideration criminal-appeal criminal-sentencing fifth-circuit mitigating-factors sentencing-guidelines standard-of-review substantive-reasonableness
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-12-02
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Fifth Circuit erred by affirming the district court's consideration of Cordavia's age and mitigating factors
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Whether the Fifth Circuit erred by affirming the district court’s consideration of Cordavia’s age and mitigating factors. Il. Whether the Fifth Circuit affirmed a substantively unreasonable sentence. 1
Docket Entries
2022-12-05
Petition DENIED.
2022-11-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/2/2022.
2022-11-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-11-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 5, 2022)
Attorneys
Cordavia Daniels
Michael Scott Davis — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent