No. 22-5984

Kenneth Wilbert Brown v. Brad Adams, Warden

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-11-03
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: attorney-communication civil-procedure court-delays diligence due-process equitable-tolling extraordinary-circumstances legal-diligence pandemic-impact related-cases
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2023-01-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)

How can a defendant be deemed not to have 'Been pursuing his rights dilligently,' when he is actively litigating 3 cases simultaneously that are all intrisicly related to one another?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . 1) How can a defendant be deemed not to have "Been pursuing his rights dilligently," when he is actively litigating 3 cases simultaneously that are all intrisicly related to one another? 2) Can almost a decade of reliable communication and sound advice, set a precedent that makes "attorney assusrances" more than "garden variety"? _ 3) When the aforementioned scenerios are at play, coupled with a history of numerous court delays and the affects.of the covid-19 pandemiy~ ~—~ ———~ ~~ “how can this not be considered an "extraordinary circumstance"that warrants Equitable Tolling?

Docket Entries

2023-01-09
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-11-30
Waiver of right of respondent Adams, Warden to respond filed.
2022-10-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 5, 2022)

Attorneys

Adams, Warden
Courtney J. HightowerAttorney General's Office, Respondent
Courtney J. HightowerAttorney General's Office, Respondent
Kenneth W. Brown
Kenneth W. Brown — Petitioner
Kenneth W. Brown — Petitioner