No. 22-5985
Islam Yaser-Abdel Said v. United States
Tags: appellate-review constitutional-challenge criminal-defendants criminal-procedure facial-attacks facial-vagueness first-amendment johnson-v-united-states sentencing-review substantive-reasonableness substantive-reasonableness-review unconstitutionally-vague
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess FirstAmendment
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess FirstAmendment
Latest Conference:
2022-12-02
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether criminal defendants challenging a statute as unconstitutionally vague may raise facial attacks in cases not involving the First Amendment?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether criminal defendants challenging a statute as unconstitutionally vague may raise facial attacks in cases not involving the First Amendment? 2. Whether substantive reasonableness review necessarily requires the court of appeals to reweigh the sentencing factors? i
Docket Entries
2022-12-05
Petition DENIED.
2022-11-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/2/2022.
2022-11-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-11-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 5, 2022)
Attorneys
Islam Yaser-Abdel Said
Kevin Joel Page — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent