No. 22-5987
Anessa R. Fierro and Willie T. Johnson v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights commerce-clause constitutional-challenge constitutional-law due-process federal-arson-statute lopez-precedent standing statutory-interpretation takings
Key Terms:
Environmental AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-12-02
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is the federal arson statute, 18 U.S.C. § 844(i), unconstitutional?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Is the federal arson statute, 18 U.S.C. § 844(i), unconstitutional? i
Docket Entries
2022-12-05
Petition DENIED.
2022-11-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/2/2022.
2022-11-10
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2022-10-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 5, 2022)
Attorneys
Anessa Fierro, et al.
Catherine White — Hurley Burish, S.C., Petitioner
Catherine White — Hurley Burish, S.C., Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent