No. 22-5988
Clemente Hernandez-Garcia v. United States
Tags: appellate-review batson-challenge batson-v-kentucky criminal-procedure discriminatory-intent equal-protection judicial-standard ninth-circuit peremptory-challenges peremptory-strike racial-discrimination
Latest Conference:
2022-12-02
Question Presented (from Petition)
If a trial court legally errs at step three of Batson, may an appellate court resolve the factual question of whether a party acted with discriminatory intent?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
If a trial court legally errs at step three of Batson, may an appellate court resolve the factual question of whether a party acted with discriminatory intent?
Docket Entries
2022-12-05
Petition DENIED.
2022-11-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/2/2022.
2022-11-10
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2022-10-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 5, 2022)
Attorneys
Clemente Hernandez-Garcia
Kara Lee Hartzler — Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent