Appropriate-standard-for-recusal-of-judges

QUESTIONS PRESENTED The questions presented here are related to both the issues ruled upon by the district court, and appealed to the 11" Circuit Court of Appeals and also all events giving rise to petitioner’s initial discrimination complaint filed in the district court NdGa that the district court referenced in full detail within its Final Order as one of its determining factors that decided this present case now being petitioned for writ of certiorari before this Court. 1. What is the appropriate standard for determining when or if a U.S. district court Judge and a U.S. Magistrate Judge are required to recuse themselves from adjudicating over a civil matter such as in this present case given that the both of them had already been named by this petitioner as the subject(s) of the simultaneous ongoing bias complaint against the two of them in the 11" Circuit Court of Appeals as in this present case. 28 U.S.C. § 455. 2. Should the district court’s refusal to apply the State of Georgia’s “Notice of a Lawsuit” standards rule which lessens the stringent evidence requirements of a petitioner’s complaint inadvertently bias the outcome and Final Order of dismissal with prejudice against this petitioner? See O.C.G.A. §§ 9-11-8 thru 9-11-11. 3. Did the district court’s treatment of this petitioner’s initial pro se complaint which was type written word for word from the downloadable standard civil discrimination complaint offered on the district court’s website constitute this petitioner’s assertion that all of her filings were held to the same standard as that of a licensed attorney? 4. Should the district have either ordered the clerk of its court to enter default judgment against defendant Pamela Ferguson in her Individual Capacity in this case given that she failed to answer or defend against to this petitioner’s complaint in her Individual Capacity and did the district court hold this petitioner to a standard of that of a practicing attorney as a reason for not entering default judgment against Pamela Ferguson? see Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 520 (1971). i