Whether the district court violated Ricky Runner's rights under the Fourth Amendment

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the district court violated Ricky Runner’s rights secured under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution by concluding that the plain view doctrine applied to justify a search by law enforcement officers of Runner’s vehicle when the same was self-admittedly predicated on the officers’ observation of a stem pipe in the console of his vehicle, stem pipes have common lawful uses, including to smoke lawfully dispensed CBD oils, and the innocent facts supplied by the anonymous informant were squarely contradicted in every material term. ii Il. STATEMENT OF RELATED CASES Counsel in unaware of any cases related to this petition. iii Ill.