No. 22-5997
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing criminal-verdict cross-examination due-process evidence fair-trial identification legal-sufficiency second-degree-offense weight-of-evidence
Latest Conference:
2022-12-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was the trial court's decision on Rodriguez's identification and use of other crimes and bad acts on cross-examination result in the denial of a fair trial?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; \, wa Cork's prescial Decision on Rodriquez. Cadentitication) And Sandoya| (vse of orer Crrmes and bad acks on Cross-examination ) Resvit wn the Carlore of Defendant to recieve a Farr trial 2 3.WWas the yory verdict both against the Weight of the Admissible evidence and legally insufficient ¢ 2. Did She People Gail to prove beyond a Reasonable Doubt that “he, Appellant should be sentenced as a Second Colony offender?
Docket Entries
2022-12-12
Petition DENIED.
2022-11-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/9/2022.
2022-11-21
Waiver of right of respondent New York to respond filed.
2022-10-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 7, 2022)
Attorneys
New York
Steven A. Bender — Westchester District Attorneys Office, Respondent
Steven A. Bender — Westchester District Attorneys Office, Respondent