No. 22-5997

Tarence Kirkland v. New York

Lower Court: New York
Docketed: 2022-11-07
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing criminal-verdict cross-examination due-process evidence fair-trial identification legal-sufficiency second-degree-offense weight-of-evidence
Latest Conference: 2022-12-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Was the trial court's decision on Rodriguez's identification and use of other crimes and bad acts on cross-examination result in the denial of a fair trial?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; \, wa Cork's prescial Decision on Rodriquez. Cadentitication) And Sandoya| (vse of orer Crrmes and bad acks on Cross-examination ) Resvit wn the Carlore of Defendant to recieve a Farr trial 2 3.WWas the yory verdict both against the Weight of the Admissible evidence and legally insufficient ¢ 2. Did She People Gail to prove beyond a Reasonable Doubt that “he, Appellant should be sentenced as a Second Colony offender?

Docket Entries

2022-12-12
Petition DENIED.
2022-11-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/9/2022.
2022-11-21
Waiver of right of respondent New York to respond filed.
2022-10-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 7, 2022)

Attorneys

New York
Steven A. BenderWestchester District Attorneys Office, Respondent
Steven A. BenderWestchester District Attorneys Office, Respondent
Tarence Kirkland
Tarence Kirkland — Petitioner
Tarence Kirkland — Petitioner