Whether courts are required by McFarland v. Scott to implement 18 U.S.C. § 3599 consistent with both the language and purpose of the statute

QUESTION PRESENTED The question presented is: Whether courts are required by McFarland v. Scott, 512 U.S. 848 (1994), to implement 18 U.S.C. § 3599 consistent with both the language and purpose of the statute and, if so, did Congress authorize federal courts to address state interference with authorized services under that statute. i