No. 22-6011
IFP
Tags: adequate-relief appellate-jurisdiction civil-procedure discretionary-powers discretionary-review due-diligence exceptional-circumstances statute-of-limitations writ-of-certiorari
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-12-02
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did respondent usurp this court's appellate jurisdiction?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED... _ , cat , : page I. DID RESPONDENT USURP THIS COURT'S APPELLATE JURISDICTION? 14 Il. IS USURPATION OF APPELLATE JURISDICTION AN EXCEPTIONAL 15 CIRCUMSTANCE WHICH WARRANTS THE EXERCISE OF THIS COURT'S DISCRETIONARY POWERS? | IH. CAN ADEQUATE RELIEF BE OBTAINED IN ANY OTHER 16 | FORM, OR FORUM? | Tv. HAS PETITIONER EXERCISED DUE DILIGENCE ? 17 ! V. HAS THE STATUTE OR LIMITATIONS TO FILE A WRIT 20 | OF CERTIORARI BEEN TOLLED? i QUESTIONS CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS
Docket Entries
2022-12-05
Petition DENIED.
2022-11-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/2/2022.
2022-11-08
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.
Attorneys
In Re Dale R. Pate
Dale Pate — Petitioner