1. Whether Appellant presents substantial evidence that the
unanimous jury verdict goes against the great weight of
the evidence presented at trial and should be overturned.

2. Whether the court erred in admitting the IME report into
evidence and allowing witness Dr. Gerald Shiener to
testify from that report.

3. Whether the court erred in allowing witness Carlo Dennis
to be present during the entire trial proceeding.

4. Whether the court erred in the modification of the jury
instructions and the verdict form.

5. Whether the District Court Erred in the "Judgment" Dated
September 23, 2021.

Whether Appellant presents substantial evidence that the unanimous jury verdict goes against the great weight of the evidence presented at trial and should be overturned