No. 22-6022
Shimar Jamal Dean Thompkins v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: circuit-precedent criminal-law criminal-procedure diversionary-disposition due-process federal-charging federal-jurisdiction judicial-interpretation sentencing sentencing-enhancement sixth-amendment statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2022-12-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a defendant's prior diversionary disposition in a felony case can be considered both an indictment and a conviction for federal charging and sentencing purposes
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether a defendant’s prior diversionary disposition in a felony case can be considered both an indictment and a conviction for federal charging and sentencing purposes. ii
Docket Entries
2022-12-12
Petition DENIED.
2022-11-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/9/2022.
2022-11-16
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-11-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 8, 2022)
Attorneys
Shimar Thompkins
Amanda Bashi — Federal Community Defender, Petitioner
Amanda Bashi — Federal Community Defender, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent