Robert C. Stryker v. Wisconsin
HabeasCorpus Privacy
Were the petitioner's Fourth Amendment rights violated when the contents of computer files held in evidence against him were revealed in warrantless searches?
QUESTIONS PRESENTED * Were the petitioner's Fourth Amendment rights violated when the contents of computer files held in evidence against him were revealed in warrantless searches? * Should federal courts reviewing state court decisions in criminal cases involving social : _ worker-patient privilege apply the federal social worker privilege first described in Jaffee v. Redmond, 518 U.S. 1 (1996), or should federal courts apply the state social workerpatient privilege? In petitioner's case, the state courts required a novel procedure to deny petitioner's claim that a computer file was subject to social worker-patient privilege under state law, finding petitioner's attorney was not ineffective for failing to seek its exclusion, and denying petitioner's motion to strike confidential information from the court record and publicly available documents. : ii