No. 22-6028

John Alan Sakon v. James N. Sakonchick, et al.

Lower Court: Connecticut
Docketed: 2022-11-08
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appellate-review civil-procedure court-settlement court-settlement-agreement due-process res-judicata statutory-interpretation statutory-rights subject-matter-jurisdiction
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2023-01-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did Superior Court Judge Aurigemma err in not finding subject matter jurisdiction to enforce a Court Settlement Agreement

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

questions presented are: 1. Did Superior Court Judge Aurigemma err in not finding subject matter oe . jurisdiction to enforce a Court Settlement Agreement which was declared a clear and unambiguous agreement enforceable by the court? . ii : 2. Did the Superior Court Judge Aurigemma violate the petitioner's due process rights by dismissing his legal action by allowing a “talking” motion to dismiss, , by considering allegations of facts outside the complaint and by failing to : | decide jurisdiction of the court by the complaint alone? ‘ | 3. Did Superior Court, the Connecticut Appellate Court and the Connecticut Supreme Court violate its own case law by refusing to enforce a Court Settlement Agreement after it was determined in a prior court ruling “that | there was a clear and unambiguous settlement reached between the plaintiff / and his four siblings...” ? . 4. Did Superior Court, the Connecticut Appellate Court and the Connecticut : Supreme Court violate the principal of res judicata by refusing to enforce a Court Settlement Agreement despite a prior court ruling “that there was a clear and unambiguous settlement reached between the plaintiff and his four . siblings” when no party took an appeal of this prior court ruling? 5. Did the Connecticut Appellate and Supreme Court violate the petitioner's due process rights by failing to resolve two apparently opposing judicial opinions in ; the Connecticut Superior Court as to the validity of the settlement? 6. Did the Connecticut Appellate and Supreme Court violate the petitioner’s statutory rights by not setting forth such facts on the record on which it found its final judgements and decrees pursuant to CT Gen Stat § 52-231 (2018)? ~ 7. Did the Connecticut Appellate and Supreme Court violated the petitioner's due process rights by not setting forth such facts on the record on which it found its final judgements and decrees pursuant to the United States Constitution?_ iii

Docket Entries

2023-01-09
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-09-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 8, 2022)

Attorneys

John Alan Sakon
John Alan Sakon — Petitioner
John Alan Sakon — Petitioner