Aaron Scurlock v. Tiffanie Clark
Immigration Patent
Question Presented
Questions Presented + . Pefnce s By granting the avidence supported motion tor inordinate delay [Appt-D, Dit Des. granted by Dish Doc ize], the Northern Dishict of riliseds found thet the state’ atfomeys! ancl , . court repartert qctlaas in Falsibying the frval transcript to include tHe eaiminal allegations Now appearing hy be V.Wis (He accuses) dinct trial feskmoay, and Post Conviction Assistont 2 _ States Atoony CPc ASA”) Colleen Gr thn, who sat 2nd chair on the steck's dajal teow, ens an lishd He hely of conflichd Assistant Public Debincle(APD) Fason Streleci and fue _. _. _.. State doetors to falsely have me cleemed until > invented a process to have my petitions ~. dzmissed on Santilness” greunds where ae such olism sealprocess exists uncer laws, fous... _ . thet they did so in an effart fo conceal te tran senipt taleifyeation coimes hom the courts, eal Then the dlistvel court erroneously adjudicated the habeos claims Card eleaizd relief) a per the Knowing l, Falsibied toial transce’pt instead af applying He per se prejadice_and iaguicn— = IAG ne farther as required for. cases of inkxttonal Fam pering with the Arial court necord’s.— —_.. Question ONE. 2 did the Northern district of Lilineis, so dae cepat doom the cccepted —_.—. and usual course of yadicial proceedings , ard.did the Sevandh Circuit sanehou such depactuce ~~ by denying a Corbificete of Appealability, se as b coll fonda exercise of this Counts Stpewisey, . Power, where He dishicl court knowingly adjudicated the habeos elaims anol denied reliel —... . § con. the basis.of the trial doanseript st had already raled so grossly fhihed + ancwhene the. ... -lichvet court epincen eperates fo buy the state actors! evnimes ig the Will. County Count... that if already fourd ccc unred , Hereby concealing the alrcanty Pound public: corruptiva fer the public, ban aad courts ? . . .