No. 22-6032
Nicholas Sterling Little v. Ronald Haynes, Superintendent, Stafford Creek Corrections Center
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-defendant other-suspect other-suspect-evidence person-a person-b post-conviction post-conviction-evidence prosecutorial-misconduct suppressed-evidence
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2023-01-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does a criminal defendant's constitutional rights violate if prosecutors use 'other-suspect' evidence to convict 'person-a' of a crime 'person-b' is accused of
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
ESTIONS PRESENTED Does it violate a criminal defendant’s Constitutional Rights if Prosecutors use “Other Suspect" evidence to convict "Person A" of a crime "Person B" is accused of when: 1) "Person A" is prevented from using the "Person B" defense after "Other Suspect" evidence was suppressed? 2) "Person A" brings forth evidence post-conviction substantiating the “Other Suspect” allegations? i
Docket Entries
2023-01-09
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-11-23
Waiver of right of respondent Ronald Haynes to respond filed.
2022-10-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 9, 2022)
Attorneys
Nicholas Little
Nicholas Sterling Little — Petitioner
Ronald Haynes
Noah Guzzo Purcell — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent