Has the Fourth Circuit Appellate Court and the lower court violated all three foundational corner stones of Rule of Law; Jurisdiction, Finding of Facts, and Conclusions of Constitutional rule of Law?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Question: Has the Fourth Circuit Appellate Court and the lower court violated all three foundational corner stones of Rule of Law; Jurisdiction, Finding of Facts, and Conclusions of Constitutional rule of Law? Question: Does this U.S. Supreme Court, obey their oath of office, to recognize and adjudicate U.S. Supreme Court precedence law, honoring in their oath; as? “A law repugnant to the Constitution is void. An act of Congress repugnant to the Constitution cannot become a law. The Constitution supersedes all other laws, and the individual’s rights shall be liberally enforced in favor of him, the clearly intended and expressly designated beneficiary.” -Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803) Additional, law. ? Question: Did these lower courts ignore, Petitioner’s fact and conclusion of law, that Petitioner clearly identified himself, as a natural living physical man, and non artificial entity identified above, and that all issues presented, here within, are, and only; Constitutional violations, requiring adjudication in America, which is a Constitutional Article HI court; which is only this honorable United States Supreme Court? -/ Question: Is it not fact arid truth that.,... Penhallow v. Doane’s Administrators (3 U.S. | 54; I Led. 3 Dall. 54/ Supreme Court ruling: No Corporate jurisdiction over the Natural } man; and that, the legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any law, agency, aspect, court, etc., can concern , itself with anything other than corporate, | artificial persons and the contracts between them? (S.C.R. 1795, (3 U.S. 54; 1 L.Ed.57; 3 | Dall.54)? | Question: Has the lower trial courts, | erred and failed to recognize, this honorable , US Supreme Court is the only Article III, Constitutional Court of law in this America | nation of my birth, to adjudicate, under , Constitutional rule of law, this living man’s, | and every living physical man and woman in | America; divine & Constitutional rights; to | not be forced under color of law, or by | extortion, and/or threat, duress, of loss of | divine and Constitutional Right to travel, Right to livelihood? Question: Is it not truth, per our Constitution 1791/Bill of Rights, that the only clearly identified Article III Constitutional Court is this Honorable U.S. Supreme Court? -2 Question: Can and will there be the four (4) minimal US Supreme Court Justices, willing, to adjudicate this Petitioner’s Writ of Certiorari; regarding three (3) Constitutional rights: (a). Right to Travel (b). Right to Livelihood, (c) ownership of a living American’s right to determine autonomy and dominion over their living , physical body, to not under threat, duress, | coercion to medically harm their body | physical body, especially experimental DNA | altering, pseudo vaccine/ jab, violating, International Treaty law; Nuremburg code? Question: Is it not factual, that medically, | there was never a lethal pandemic that required any emergency response and authorization of a mRNA; (Exhibit 5); untested bogus alleged vaccine, twofold; because covid-19 was never produced in a lab; its test was bogus PCR was so highly cycled, it produced over a 90 % false positive results, and most importantly, only a 99.9x% survival statistical rate? Question: Is it not factual, that the U.S. Supreme Court case of -dJacobson v. Massachusetts, U.S; February 20, 1905, has absolutely, no validity in this century, 117 years later? -~z Question: Will this honorable USS. Supreme Court upon in the debt of right action, grant this Petition for Writ of Certiorari, review closely this physician’s medical research, double blind studies, peer reviewed, medical facts: not opinions; Masks,... physically hurt and harm & they do not protect! Physically masks are metaphor, like putting a chain link fence in your back yard, to keep mosquitoes out? Question: Will this honorable US Supreme court, via Justices that are not political party biased, and whom have the integrity to obey and adj