No. 22-6042

Ryan Hayes v. United States

Lower Court: First Circuit
Docketed: 2022-11-10
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal-waiver criminal-procedure discretionary-review due-process equal-protection first-circuit sentencing
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2023-01-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the First Circuit erred in affirming the denial of a role reduction and in failing to find a violation of due process and equal protection, based on the reasoning that the defendant forfeited his right to make these claims by failing to challenge the enforceability of the appeal waiver

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED This case before the First Circuit Court of Appeals, where the District Court affirmed the denial of applying a role reduction and in failing to find a violation of due process and equal protection, reasoning that Mr. Hayes forfeited his right to make these claims by failing to challenge the enforceability of the appeal waiver. United States v. Hayes, No. 20-2121, (Aug. 10, 2021, 1° Cir. 2022) (“Hayes”). The First Circuit reasoned that because the sentencing court stated that it “would have imposed the same sentence” even if it had considered defendant’s equal protection and due process arguments, “a clear and gross injustice” was not present sufficient for the First Circuit to exercise it’s discretion to review the sentence. See

Docket Entries

2023-01-09
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-11-22
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2022-11-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 12, 2022)

Attorneys

Ryan Hayes
William Stuart MaddoxLaw Office of William S. Maddox, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent