Whether the district court erred in dismissing Oparaji's complaint

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW. La 1. Whether the district court erred in dismissing Oparaji's complaint under Fed. R. al 4 Civ] P. 12(b) (6), alleging'that Oparaji sets no factual allegations in support of his” , Bt chip that would entitle him to relief. “4 is 2. Whether the district court erred in dismissing Opataji's action for failure to state i a clgim under the Electronic Fund Transfer Act (EFTA). | F 3. Whether the district court erred in denying Oparaji's motion for partial summary ~ i Fi judgment. =. Pons ae . i 4. Whether the district court erred in holding that Oparaji sets no factual # allegations in support of his claim that would entitle him to relief. a . 5. Whether any of the district court's procedural and evidentiary rulings constituted 4h an apse of discretion requiring reversal of the judgment. PA . 6. Whether Oparaji’s complaint gives Municipal Credit Union (MCU) fair notice | ‘e + ‘ of what the Oparaji’s claim is and the ground upon which it rests. iq q 7, Whether the Second Circuit failed to review a district court's dismissals under i B . Rule 12(b) (6) de novo and decisions to abstain from exercising supplemental ti 6 jurisdiction. Le : ae | , rt . ° BY