Christine Owens v. Mahershal Simonet
JusticiabilityDoctri
Should Mahershal Simonet have been placed into custody?
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | os 1.) Should have Mahershal Simonet been placed into custody by Justice William C. i Redmond because, petitioner, Christine Owens needed to file a Temporary . Restraining Order against him for eluding his participation in a human trafficking | ( onboarding process? ; | 2.) Was the Appellate court with special duty to respond to opening up a criminal a investigation against Al0 Capital LLC Executive, JERRY E. DUNN, for massive \ human trafficking, after being presented as a fraudulent Paycheck Protection ( Program Lender and also formed a company called AVIATION SECURITIZATION C which translates the intention and creates imagery to secure aircraft purposed to C fly a PPP trafficked victim at the bottom of a commercial flight? A 3.) Was the California Supreme Court with a social responsibility to assign a lawyer i to Case Number S275429 being that the assignment of an attorney is in fact within | C their judicial diagram upon knowledge trafficked victims have increased from 26 | Oo Million to 28 Million according to the Guardian Organization and petitioner, co Christine Owens, is a paid-for, SLAVE UNCAPTURED? C C C C , C f ~ . \ ne ‘. C a