No. 22-6060

Christine Owens v. Mahershal Simonet

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2022-11-17
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-investigation due-process human-trafficking judicial-responsibility paycheck-protection-program standing temporary-restraining-order victim-protection
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2023-01-20
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Should Mahershal Simonet have been placed into custody?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | os 1.) Should have Mahershal Simonet been placed into custody by Justice William C. i Redmond because, petitioner, Christine Owens needed to file a Temporary . Restraining Order against him for eluding his participation in a human trafficking | ( onboarding process? ; | 2.) Was the Appellate court with special duty to respond to opening up a criminal a investigation against Al0 Capital LLC Executive, JERRY E. DUNN, for massive \ human trafficking, after being presented as a fraudulent Paycheck Protection ( Program Lender and also formed a company called AVIATION SECURITIZATION C which translates the intention and creates imagery to secure aircraft purposed to C fly a PPP trafficked victim at the bottom of a commercial flight? A 3.) Was the California Supreme Court with a social responsibility to assign a lawyer i to Case Number S275429 being that the assignment of an attorney is in fact within | C their judicial diagram upon knowledge trafficked victims have increased from 26 | Oo Million to 28 Million according to the Guardian Organization and petitioner, co Christine Owens, is a paid-for, SLAVE UNCAPTURED? C C C C , C f ~ . \ ne ‘. C a

Docket Entries

2023-01-23
Petition DENIED
2023-01-23
Petition DENIED.
2023-01-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/20/2023.
2022-11-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 19, 2022)

Attorneys

Christine Owens
Christine Owens — Petitioner
Christine Owens — Petitioner