No. 22-6066
Brent Stephens v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
IFP
Tags: 28-usc-2244 28-usc-2254 appeal appeal'\n\n'Whether the Federal Court of Appeals f appeal'\n\n'Whether the U.S. District Court Magist appellate-procedure certificate-of-appealability criminal-procedure due-process exhaustion exhaustion'\n\n'Whether the Federal Court of Appea federal-statute fifth-circuit habeas-corpus judicial-deference jury-trial jury-verdict magistrate-bar procedural-bar sentencing standard-of-review standard-of-review'\n\n'Whether the U.S. District trial-court-authority
Latest Conference:
2023-01-13
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION A: Whether the Trial Court had the authority to supplant
the verdict of the jury on punishment?
QUESTION B: Whether the U.S. District Court Magistrate properly
imposed a bar pursuant to: 28 U.S.C. § 2244/ and 2254?
QUESTION C: Whether the Federal Court of Appeals for the Fifth
Circuit adequately determined that a Certificate of Appealabilty
should not issue?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Trial Court had the authority to supplant the verdict of the jury on punishment
Docket Entries
2023-01-17
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/13/2023.
2022-11-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 16, 2022)
Attorneys
Brent Stephens
Brent Stephens — Petitioner