No. 22-6066
Brent Stephens v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
IFP
Tags: 28-usc-2244 28-usc-2254 appeal appeal'\n\n'Whether the Federal Court of Appeals f appeal'\n\n'Whether the U.S. District Court Magist appellate-procedure certificate-of-appealability criminal-procedure due-process exhaustion exhaustion'\n\n'Whether the Federal Court of Appea federal-statute fifth-circuit habeas-corpus judicial-deference jury-trial jury-verdict magistrate-bar procedural-bar sentencing standard-of-review standard-of-review'\n\n'Whether the U.S. District trial-court-authority
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2023-01-13
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Trial Court had the authority to supplant the verdict of the jury on punishment
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED QUESTION A: Whether the Trial Court had the authority to supplant the verdict of the jury on punishment? QUESTION B: Whether the U.S. District Court Magistrate properly . imposed a bar pursuant to: 28 U.S.C. § 2244, and 2254? QUESTION C: Whether the Federal Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit adequately determined that a Certificate ot Appealabilty should not issue? ii
Docket Entries
2023-01-17
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/13/2023.
2022-11-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 16, 2022)