No. 22-6071
Manuel Bracamontes v. California
IFP
Tags: aggravating-circumstances constitutional-rights death-penalty due-process jury-determination jury-trial mitigating-circumstances reasonable-doubt
Key Terms:
DueProcess Punishment Copyright Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess Punishment Copyright Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-01-13
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the mandatory weighing of aggravating and mitigating circumstances under the California death penalty statute violate the Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Does the mandatory weighing of aggravating and mitigating circumstances under the California death penalty statute—a factfinding determination that serves to increase the statutory maximum for the crime—violate the Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments where there is no requirement this determination must be found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt? ii STATEMENT OF
Docket Entries
2023-01-17
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/13/2023.
2022-12-15
Brief of respondent California in opposition filed.
2022-11-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 16, 2022)
2022-08-25
Application (22A180) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until November 12, 2022.
2022-08-23
Application (22A180) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 13, 2022 to November 12, 2022, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
California
Meredith S. White — California Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Meredith S. White — California Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Manuel Bracamonte
Albert Joel Kutchins — Office of the State Public Defender, Petitioner
Albert Joel Kutchins — Office of the State Public Defender, Petitioner