Should the Barker v. Wingo four-factor test for determining speedy trial violations be overruled and replaced with a more precise method?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 4, Should Barker Vi Winaos, Yor US. S14,42 S. at 2182.33L.2b,25 101 C1472) Four Factors IN delerming when AN Accused Right to A Speedy Arial has beew Ulolated be Overruled ane S/uen A Mote precise Method /Cuide 1 protecting, A . Ae fendpnt's Comstitutional Due. process Right ° Le tas the State of Mississipg: Eroded the. United. Stots Supreme Court's Barker v. Wing o's Balancing —test Analysis by requitine APFicmatee demonstrp}ion OF AIL Four Facters As she touchstone Fer Providing A denial o€ Constibetionnl Right 4o ft speesy trial , Awd that denial of deferdamts Claim on around that 4 Showing that all factors did Not weigh IN defepdant's Favot VoAS eSSenstel to establish & Speeey \eia) Ulolahen °