No. 22-6085
Curtis Neville v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: brady-materiality brady-v-maryland cooperating-witness credibility criminal-evidence due-process due-process-violation kyles-v-whitley material-evidence prosecutorial-disclosure witness-credibility
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-01-06
Related Cases:
22-6046
(Vide)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is an incentivized cooperating witness's letter material under Brady v. Maryland and Kyles v. Whitley?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED In a prosecution built almost entirely on the credibility of cooperating Government witnesses, is an incentivized cooperating witness’s letter addressed to an Orleans Parish Assistant District Attorney that says—the entire case against the defendants is made up of lies and that the two star cooperating witnesses lied about a lot of things—material under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419 (1995)? i
Docket Entries
2023-01-09
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-11-23
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-11-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 19, 2022)
2022-10-06
Application (22A281) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until November 10, 2022.
2022-09-30
Application (22A281) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 11, 2022 to November 30, 2022, submitted to Justice Alito.
Attorneys
Curtis Neville
Michael Raspanti — Raspanti Law Firm, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent