No. 22-6094

William Milton v. California

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2022-11-18
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-sentencing descamps-v-united-states due-process mathis-v-united-states prior-conviction-enhancement retroactivity sixth-amendment supreme-court-precedent
Key Terms:
DueProcess Jurisdiction
Latest Conference: 2023-01-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Are the Sixth Amendment holdings of Descamps v. United States, 570 U.S. 254 (2013) and Mathis v. United States, 579 U.S. 500 (2016) fully retroactive

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Are the Sixth Amendment holdings of Descamps v. United States, 570 U.S. 254 (2013) and Mathis v. United States, 579 U.S. 500 (2016) fully retroactive, because those opinions categorically prohibit imposition of a prior conviction enhancement where the enhancement requires additional facts beyond the adjudicated elements of the prior conviction offense? i

Docket Entries

2023-01-09
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-11-28
Waiver of right of respondent California to respond filed.
Main DocumentMain Document
2022-11-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 19, 2022)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixCertificate of Word CountProof of ServiceMotion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendix

Attorneys

California
Louis Ward Karlin — California Deparment of Justice, Office of the Att, Respondent
Louis Ward Karlin — California Deparment of Justice, Office of the Att, Respondent
William Milton
Brad Kannof Kaiserman — The Law Office of Brad K. Kaiserman, Petitioner
Brad Kannof Kaiserman — The Law Office of Brad K. Kaiserman, Petitioner