Robert Lewis v. Hoke County, North Carolina, et al.
Whether Ans Repellee's onmaddatery Response That Fully Riiefed The macs OF The Tesue Subject To Waiver Lohoot Realy Mew Or Vortec Gueerisa May Be The Fxeagilor! Tht Tahibas A Cava dt Rgoerl's Piseceliod Te Triveke The waives Deckide?
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED LL Whether Ans Repellee’s onmaddatery Response That Fully Riiefed The macs OF The Tesue Subject To Waiver Lohoot Realy Mew Or Vortec Gueerisa May Be The Fxeagilor! Tht Tahibas A Cava dt Rgoerl’s Piseceliod Te Triveke The waives Deckide ? TL Whether The Fourth Cieeiits Replication OF Local Rule 34(b) Ceantes A Waiglsterted Plending Staddad For How An Lesue Must Be Framed Tn The Rollant’s Bet To Prvoid Waiver Cavses Pro Se Litigatts To Lose Rights Because OF A Nouwillfel Friluce To Carel 4 DAL Ts Repricenest Tl. Whiter A Coud OF Repeal May Vole iy Litignats Rides To Equal Fdedion OF The Laws by Refusing, To Reply A Wall Settled Rule OF Law Equally Rrrongst The LAlgartts Fac Whom The Law Was Designed 2