Question not identified

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Does Congress give this Court the authority under 28 U.S.C. 1292(e) to review the Fourteenth Amendment mandates under the case or controversy jurisdiction which “contains three elements” showing the plaintiff/appellant has suffered: (a) an injury in fact; (6) a causal connection between the injury; and the defendants’ conduct complained of in the district court nugatory docket entry] 12/16/2014? 2. Can this Court review a state’s solicitor general’s 1 day late filing of warrant and arrest is all but the plainly incompetent or one who is kwowing violating federal law that establish a constitutional violation and that the constitutional violation “clearly established,” is the denial to qualified immunity at the motion to dismiss stage? 3. Can this Court review the public’s interest jurisdiction within the two (2) years statute of limitation of a timely fashion notice of complaint “zone of interest,” after the district court has ordered an extension of five (5) days time dated 01/09/2019 under F-R.A.P. Rule 2 which gives the court of appeals the power, for “good cause shown,” for taking the appeal by permission under 28 U.S.C. 1292(b) and/or F-R.A.P. Rule 5 et seq.? 4. Can this Court rehear multiple appeals under the district court order dated 03/06/2017 granting the defendants motion to withdraw as attorney for ER.C.P. Rule 41 et seq. decision, seeking to resolve allegations of restricted court docket facts in the original petition in the interest of the public’s due process of law rights that was determined with the district court nugatory discovery evidence for the Federal Circuit jurisdiction. FR.A.P. Rule 3(c)?