No. 22-6105

Eric Malmstrom v. United States

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-11-18
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-procedure circuit-precedent en-banc federal-courts judicial-review stare-decisis
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2023-01-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Must a federal court of appeals adhere to the principle of stare decisis and abide by prior circuit precedent absent an intervening decision from this Court or a court of appeals sitting en banc?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Must a federal court of appeals adhere to the principle of stare decisis and abide by prior circuit precedent absent an intervening decision from this Court or a court of appeals sitting en banc?

Docket Entries

2023-01-09
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-12-19
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-11-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 19, 2022)

Attorneys

Eric Malmstrom
Sarah Rose WeinmanOffice of the Federal Defender, Petitioner
Sarah Rose WeinmanOffice of the Federal Defender, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent