No. 22-6116
Edmund Lowell Fields v. Chandler Cheeks
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: access-to-courts civil-procedure complainant-access constitutional-provisions due-process great-writ habeas-corpus judicial-malfeasance judicial-misconduct judicial-review standing statutory-provisions
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-02-24
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
SHOULD THE COMPLAINANT BE DENIED ACCESS TO THE GREAT WRIT BECAUSE OF JUDICIAL MALFEASANCE?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED , SHOOLD THE COMPLAINANT BE DENIED ACCESS TO THE GREAT WRIT BECADSE OF JUDICIAL MAIFEASANCE? :
Docket Entries
2023-02-27
Rehearing DENIED.
2023-02-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/24/2023.
2023-01-27
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2023-01-09
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-12-01
Waiver of right of respondent Acting Warden Fredeane Artis to respond filed.
2022-10-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 21, 2022)
Attorneys
Acting Warden Fredeane Artis
Fadwa A. Hammoud — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent
Edmund Lowell Fields
Edmund L. Fields — Petitioner