Where the U.S. Court of Appeals did not properly and appropriately proceeded with two consolidated interlocutory appeals on the District Court's order denying Motion for Special Master and Motion to Reconsider the District Court's order denying a Motion for a Special Master to investigate alleged blackmail videos of child rape and murder concerning 'judges' and 'officials?

Questions Presented Where the U.S. Court of Appeals did not properly and appropriately proceeded with two consolidated interlocutory appeals on the District Court's order denying Motion for Special Master and Motion to Reconsider the District Court’s order denying a Motion for a Special Master to investigate alleged blackmail videos of child rape and murder concerning “judges” and “officials”? Where the U.S. District Court improperly and unlawfully denied the undisputed, uncontested Motions for Special Master and Appointment of Counsel to conduct discovery and review of credible Georgia Attorney L. Lin Wood’s claim of allegedly “judges” and “officials” being blackmailed with child rape and murder in such a horrendous scheme by the Intelligence agencies? Where the U.S. Court of Appeals wrongfully . dismissed the appeals by claiming that they have a lack of jurisdiction when such interlocutory appeals were necessary over the issues of needing a Special ii Master to subpoena Attorney Lin Wood for the alleged video recordings and review over alleged video recordings of “judges” being potentially blackmailed with child rape and murder which may affect their impartiality and independence, in sheer violation of Due Process of Law requiring IMPARTIALITY OF JUDGES and in violation of 28 U.S.C. § 455? Where the U.S. District Court had erred or abused discretion on denying Motion for Special Master and Motion to Reconsider the District Court’s order denying a Motion for a Special Master, because the judges who are involved in the case may or may not be blackmailed with child rape and murder which may be considered a CONFLICT OF INTEREST, and should have stepped aside after Petitioner made such allegations with a credible witness alleging the . existence of GOD-KNOWS-HOW-MANY blackmail videos of “judges” and “officials”, to allow a Special Master to order the alleged blackmail scheme video recordings or tapes alleged by Attorney L. Lin Wood? Where case law precedent in this very Court and the lower Courts all held that a Special Master is , ii warranted in special circumstances and that refusal to appoint a Special Master (with no potential conflict of interest issues) over matters such as judges possibly , being blackmailed with a sexual crime may throw the entire judicial system in jeopardy causing lack of confidence and a lack of integrity? ‘ Where the “due process of law” clause of the U.S. Constitution, Amendment V, is being deprived and ignored by the U.S. District Court in the Middle District of North Carolina and the supervisory Court known as the U.S. Court of Appeals by allowing their judges to possibly be blackmailed with anything including child rape and murder without ever so much as an investigation or questioning the witness Attorney L. Lin Wood who is protecting his source or sources requiring the necessary need for a subpoena or court order to review over the alleged blackmail videos alleged by this Attorney on Twitter last year? | iv