No. 22-6126
Jeffrey Salt v. Waterkeeper Alliance, Inc.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-contempt civil-procedure due-process fifth-amendment intellectual-property non-party non-party-injunction trademark trademark-dispute
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment Trademark
DueProcess FifthAmendment Trademark
Latest Conference:
2023-01-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did Jeffrey Salt's Fifth Amendment due process rights violate when the District Court ruled he was bound by an injunction and subject to civil contempt as a non-party?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Were Jeffrey Salt’s fifth amendment due process rights violated when the District Court, in a federal civil trademark case between two corporations, ruled that he was bound by an injunction and subject to imprisonment for civil contempt as a non-party, after denying him entry into the case as a party, thereby prohibiting him from asserting his individual right to disputed intellectual property? 3
Docket Entries
2023-01-09
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-12-06
Waiver of right of respondent Waterkeeper Alliance, Inc. to respond filed.
2022-11-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 21, 2022)
Attorneys
Jeffrey Salt
Joseph A. Vita — Joseph A. Vita Law Office, Petitioner
Joseph A. Vita — Joseph A. Vita Law Office, Petitioner
Waterkeeper Alliance, Inc.
Jason Libou — Wachtel Missry LLP, Respondent
Jason Libou — Wachtel Missry LLP, Respondent