Juan Martin Figueroa v. W. L. Montgomery, Warden
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
whether-the-prosecutor-deprived-figueroa-of-due-process-compulsory-process-and-a-fair-trial
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Prosecutor Deprived Figueroa of Due Process, Compulsory Process, and a Fair Trial by Intentionally Misleading Defense Counsel? 1 TOPICAL INDEX Page CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS AND REGULATIONS A. State Court Trial Proceedings .2 B. Direct Appeal . 0.0.0. c eee C. Federal Habeas Proceedings .3 STATEMENT OF THE FACTS ELICITED FROM THE CALIFORNIA COURT OF APPEAL OPINION .4 REASON TO GRANT CERTIORARI .7 I. THE PROSECUTOR DEPRIVED FIGUEROA OF DUE PROCESS, COMPULSORY PROCESS, AND A FAIR TRIAL BY INTENTIONALLY MISLEADING A. The Prosecutor Represented that the State Would Present Witness Ibarra .6 B. Judge Perry Denied Figueroa’s Motion for New Trial 2.0... eee 8 C. Relevant Federal Law and Analysis .10 il D. The Law Holds Prosecutor to High Ethical Standards . 0.000 cece eee eee eee LL E. The CCA Unreasonably Overlooked That the Prosecutor’s and Judge Perry’s Omissions Deprived Figueroa of Due Process, a Fair Trial and the Court’s Compulsory Process .12