Whether the district court abused its discretion by failing to comply with Section 404 (c) of the First Step Act of 2018

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED QUESTON NUMBER ONE: Whether the district court abused its discretion by failing to comply with Section 404 (c) of the First Step Act of 2018, ensuring a complete review prior to denial and did the district court’s 47-word order provide a sufficient explanation for rejecting his request for a reduced sentence, thus, in violation of the U.S. Supreme Court’s Ruling in Concepcion v. United States, 142 S. Ct. 2389 (2022) ? QUESTION NUMBER TWO: Whether the district court misunderstood the scope of its discretion when it denied Petitioner Wade’s Section 404 (b) Motion, thus, did this constitute an abuse of discretion in the matter herein ?