No. 22-6143
Blake Sandlain v. C. Maruka, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: compelled-speech content-neutrality first-amendment free-speech government-regulation private-entities
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference:
2023-01-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the First Amendment prohibits the government from compelling private entities to host and disseminate speech they disagree with
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : oe GE ERVES TZ 243726 $F$ el oe Ze eae eq 4 oR REE . sh, ¢ $$ 2ZZE 44626 @ oe ce GPS Poet et . eC ge & a cee sa CO 2 veg euvge m oc (?) 5B uBe 8 : . UE R 9 . & vmnZ ec = “Vv Hae * 2 . . GC pn e FQ v Cc Fg e° i ; Pee zr KC m z FEB 2: iw] E2ZpES 4.4 go 5 kt 4 . Caguae se EF OL ep % SS Fee ; . . won
Docket Entries
2023-01-09
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2022-12-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-12-01
Waiver of right of respondent C. Maruka, Warden to respond filed.
2022-11-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 22, 2022)
Attorneys
C. Maruka, Warden
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent