Whether being in federal custody for marijuana-related offenses is a substantial denial of constitutional liberty without due process

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether being in federal custody is a substantial denial of Richard Daniels’ constitutional right of liberty, without “sufficient cause,” without compelling reasons for the United States Congress to proscribe marijuana as a dangerous substance, to be a drug trafficking crime, therefore without due process of law in violation of Amendments IV and V of the Constitution of the United States and is unconstitutional. 2. Whether the exceptional circumstance is the above question has never been decided by this Court. i. PARTY TO THE PROCEEDING Richard Daniels, B.O.P. 13251-036 is on in custody of: RRM Philadelphia ; Residential Reentry Office 2nd & Chestnut St.-7 Floor Philadelphia, PA 19106 CPA-CCM@bop.gov Phone: (215)-521-7454 RRC-Pharos House (207) 774-6021 RELATED CASE 28 U.S. Code § 2242 United States District Court, District of Maine U. S.A. v. Daniels 2:18-cr-00063-GZS-1 Doc. No. 1115 Ordering Affirming Recommended Decision (5/19/2022) Doc. No. 1105 Report and Recommended Decision on 28 U.S.C. §2255 Motion (4/8/2022) Doe. No. 1071 § 2255 Motion to Vacate filed 12/1/2021 APPENDLX’S