Whether the Ninth Circuit incorrectly applied Arizona law in finding that multiple instances of prosecutorial misconduct did not prejudice petitioner under Strickland v. Washington

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Ninth Circuit incorrectly applied Arizona law in finding that multiple instances of prosecutorial misconduct, including falsely representing key evidence, commenting on the defendant’s silence, vouching evidence not admitted at trial, and misstating the law, did not prejudice petitioner under Strickland v. Washington. @)