Eric Lee Porterfield v. Department of Justice, et al.
Whether the petitioner has the same protections as an independent contractor
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ‘e Woes i vonkrach 2 . 9.8 & VADENOME & SCCONDAN “THben ale 2 8, Yous B LLC profeck tine TMogesty o§ rks OW fron eyes 4 wnfringen 2 Ne Con & contrac be va\yd Siro sWenee + , ; Bo pees a Cembe ond oon te vohardore> a Val vonrae} * 6. Does A yrodenant have He Sane prola Lions as m pendent. z 7, poes & Haden yer Yoo Baan ate oworver Crom oppes rolpong ater 2 8. Pees ee ¢ eae eye Aion for ws ‘attats Una eur: qs Restore Harle’s and eontracl loehocen he Mand Pans delendandis) congdypra rival ous Wi Nofore 3 lo. Does Nhe Qanatt havea ria bo be neard % Us Vth the debt amount over $25,202 °° Did The Crear tourh have Rduly Ys oxtepl We, tase 2 12 dog, Ye cures iV cou rt have, to axcebt the par oft 5