Whether a re-sentencing hearing under the new First Step Act entitles a defendant to the right to effective assistance of counsel under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment, and whether the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment entitle the defendant to have an attorney that would adequately represent him, by keeping an open dialogue as to the defendant's court proceedings either by phone or mail, and that was open to legal input by the defendant to offer mitigating evidence in favor of leniency

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED __ This court SHould GRANT . A. REVIEW.To. SETTLE THE QuESTION WEATHER A. RE-SENTENCING HEARING UNDER THE NEW. .. " Maw SENATE Bit. 1393, ENTTLES. A DEFENDANT. . TE RiGkT..vo. EFEECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF. COUNSEL UNDER | Tue _ Sixth AND. FouRTEENTH AMENDMENT OF THE UTED AbSO.D0ES THE. | SIXTH AND FouRTEEATH AMENDMENT ENTITLE THE DEFENDANT To HAVE AN.. ATTORNEY THAT Would ADEQUATLY. REPRESENT Him, | BY KeePing A OPEN DiALOQUE AS To THE DEFENDANTS _._ | CouRT PROCEEDINGS T'TWER..BY. PHONE oR Mail, AND That WAS OfEN To LEGAL. INPUT BY THE DEFENDANT To _ OFFER Mitigating GVioENcE iw FAVOR OF LENIENCY. /