No. 22-6155

Ryan McGuire v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-11-28
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: confrontation confrontation-clause criminal-trial cross-examination due-process fair-trial impeachment impeachment-evidence law-enforcement
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy
Latest Conference: 2023-01-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does a trial court's ruling excluding evidence at trial violate a criminal defendant's right to due process, including the rights to confront and examine law enforcement witnesses

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Does a trial court’s ruling excluding evidence at trial violate a criminal defendant’s right to due process, including the rights to confront and examine law enforcement witnesses, when the ruling precludes cross-examination designed to impeach the thoroughness and good faith of a law enforcement investigation on information obtained by law enforcement that some person other than the defendant committed the crime? i

Docket Entries

2023-01-09
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-11-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-11-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 28, 2022)

Attorneys

Ryan McGuire
Stephen R. HormelHormel law Office, LLC, Petitioner
Stephen R. HormelHormel law Office, LLC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent