Shall we send the wrong message to public that judges use illogical technicalities over interests of justice to cover for Florida Governor?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Shall we send the wrong message to public that judges use illogical technicalities over interests of justice to cover for Florida Governor? 2. Forget Civil Rights, for a moment. Was it appropriate for Courts to not judge the issue of guardianship with proof of non-guardianship? 3. Isn’t it against the law to take inheritances for whatever reason? May 30, 2022, 9:30-pm, Petitioner met homeless man institutionalized for 1-day and let go, I believe because his “father took millions to the grave” and Florida State took dads Unclaimed Funds 4. Shall judges be allowed to set aside a case based on his/her connection to Respondent? Isn’t this a Constitution 101 No-No? Abuse of power can cause poverty in this generational inheritance loophole I am fighting, which disgraces American Flag, rather than being stewards of goodwill. If you agree, unicorn in. Life’s short. 5. Would the Appearance of a Florida Guardianship CEO linked to Murders give the appearance to the common man reason to doubt judges’ impartiality in dismissing the case? WhyNOT DIG DEEPER for relief in public’s best interest? Petitioner saved others’ lives ultimately by getting CEO fired and judge dismisses standing laws? 6. Should the law be allowed to take inheritance of wards in guardianships? They take it all!? 7 ii |