Whether the lower courts erred in affirming the conviction for aggravated identity theft, in violation of the petitioner's civil-rights, due-process, and right to a jury of his peers

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Appeal from originating case from the : UNITE® STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE case No. 2:19-cr-20065-1msn Appealed to the UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT case No. 21-6064 Affirming Aggrivated Identity theft as on record with the clerk's office in originating case.? 2. That petitioner rights has been violated per Title 42 section 1983 on court clerk record filed with the Tennessee Department of Commerce and Insurance.? 3. Petitioner right per file on record of Writ of Mandamus for jury of his own peers.? : ; 4, That said lower courts have ignored Rule 60(b) lack of having personal Jurisdiction? 5. Courts have not answered INTERROGATORIES as per FRCP? 6. That said courts opinion are based on all heresay evidence? 7. That the United States Attorney Office have frauded the Court as explained on record in petioners Affidavit Of Truth and Repudiation filed with the clerk of Court Office?