No. 22-6175

Nancy Abbie Tallent v. Phillip Knight, et al.

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-11-30
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 42-usc-1983 civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process evidence evidence-exclusion judicial-bias pro-se pro-se-litigation section-1983 supervisory-power supreme-court-intervention
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2023-02-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Where officers violated the Petitioner rights afforded by the Constitution of the United States, under 42 U.S. Code § 1983, after exhausting all known remedies for judicial deviations from the rules and bias so evident that no evidence whatsoever has been allowed to be entered into the court record, will the United States Supreme Court exercise its supervisory power as a last resort and intervene to allow this and subsequent pro se litigants the ability to enter evidence into the court record and the right to be heard which will allow any judge a basis upon which to rule?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Where officers violated the Petitioner rights afforded by the Constitution of the United States, under 42 U.S. Code § 1983, after exhausting all known remedies for judicial deviations from the rules and bias so evident that no evidence whatsoever has been allowed to be entered into the court record, will the United States Supreme Court exercise its supervisory power as a last resort and intervene to allow this and subsequent pro se litigants the ability to enter evidence into the court record and the right to be heard which will allow any judge a basis upon which to rule? \ ; 2

Docket Entries

2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-01-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2022-10-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 30, 2022)

Attorneys

Nancy Abbie Tallent
Nancy Abbie Tallent — Petitioner