No. 22-6179
Brandon J. Office v. Marcus Myers
IFP
Tags: charging-document constitutional-provisions criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus illegal-sentence motion-to-correct sentencing
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2023-02-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was the Petitioner entitled to Habeas Corpus Relief?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Was the Petitioner entitled to Habeas Corpus Relief, where the Petitioner properly raised a Motion to Correct an Hlegal Sentence? 2. Was the Petitioner entitled to Habeas Corpus Relief, where the Petitioner’s sentence is invalid and illegal, where it rest upon the improper “amendment” of a null and void charging document? 2
Docket Entries
2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-01-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2022-11-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 30, 2022)
Attorneys
Brandon Office
Brandon J. Office — Petitioner